Jonathan is a graphic artist, illustrator, writer and game designer. Jonathan is such a nerd, he is actually working to open a comic book store in San Antonio so he can sit back and do little more than discussing whether or not Han shot first with like-minded individuals. In the meantime, he is a Retired Soldier and enjoys researching and writing about history, science, theology, and many other subjects. He writes for ScreenRant, CBR, NerdBastards, Listverse, TheQuiz, TheRichest, WatchMoJo, TopTenz, CinemaDrugs, TasteofCinema, Wonderslist, and Grunge. You can check out his latest on Twitter: @TalkingBull or on his blog: jonathanhkantor.com
4 thoughts on “ONE OF THE US MILITARY’S LAST PROPELLOR-DRIVEN ATTACK AIRCRAFT WAS A STAR IN VIETNAM”
Hello Jonathan, I read your article. In it, you repeatedly mention ‘turboprop’ engines. The WWII aircraft and this A1 do not have turboprop engines. These planes use piston engines, either water cooled inline, or air cooled radials. A turboprop engine is a jet engine that drives a propeller through a reduction gear. Many commercial passenger planes and also expensive private planes that use propellers utilize a jet engine this way.
Kind regards, Tony
I appreciate y’all letting me know about the error. I definitely misunderstood the term turboprop, and several people have contacted me about making a change to the piece. I typically don’t get comments on my articles, but so far, six people have let me know about this issue, so I’ve requested a correction from the editor.
Good story Jonathan… BUT… The A1 Skyraider is NOT a “turboprop”! It’s RADIAL engine IS turboCHARGED, but darned sure, NOT a “flaming fan”. Later, Tom former RMC USN
In your article of the A1 skyraider, you called it a turboprop. It isn’t a turboprop. A turboprop is a gas turbine engine powering a propeller. The A1 has a radial piston engine. When I opened your profile I was supprised to see you were in military intelligence. I was army aviation attached to an ASA unit in Thailand. At that base I had seen A1s and it was an odd sight compared to the B52s there.
Jonathan is a graphic artist, illustrator, writer, and game designer. Jonathan retired from the U.S. Army in 2017 and enjoys researching and writing about history, science, theology, and many other subjects. He writes for ScreenRant, CBR, NerdBastards, Listverse, Ranker, WhatCulture, and many other sites online. You can check out his latest on Twitter: @TalkingBull or on his blog: jonathanhkantor.com
Hello Jonathan, I read your article. In it, you repeatedly mention ‘turboprop’ engines. The WWII aircraft and this A1 do not have turboprop engines. These planes use piston engines, either water cooled inline, or air cooled radials. A turboprop engine is a jet engine that drives a propeller through a reduction gear. Many commercial passenger planes and also expensive private planes that use propellers utilize a jet engine this way.
Kind regards, Tony
Tony, Tom, and Carl
I appreciate y’all letting me know about the error. I definitely misunderstood the term turboprop, and several people have contacted me about making a change to the piece. I typically don’t get comments on my articles, but so far, six people have let me know about this issue, so I’ve requested a correction from the editor.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Thanks,
Jonathan
Good story Jonathan… BUT… The A1 Skyraider is NOT a “turboprop”! It’s RADIAL engine IS turboCHARGED, but darned sure, NOT a “flaming fan”. Later, Tom former RMC USN
In your article of the A1 skyraider, you called it a turboprop. It isn’t a turboprop. A turboprop is a gas turbine engine powering a propeller. The A1 has a radial piston engine. When I opened your profile I was supprised to see you were in military intelligence. I was army aviation attached to an ASA unit in Thailand. At that base I had seen A1s and it was an odd sight compared to the B52s there.